GP Academy Letter 250912: RIP Charlie Kirk...Or Maybe Not?

I’m sure by now that we’ve all been horrified to see the public assassination of Charlie Kirk who, allegedly, was shot by a sniper dressed in black from a rooftop who later can be seen running across the roof.

Let me point out that Charlie’s meteoric rise to stardom from the age of 18 bore all the hallmarks of a selected individual with deep insider support. Let me also point out that all of politics is essentially theater.

And already anomalies are popping up. Prior to the shooting there’s a ring on Charlie’s 4^th finger. After the shooting the ring moves to his pinky finger and the bullet hole stays stationary.

Charlie was hit in the neck artery, a shot requiring exquisite precision. Why not just shoot him in the head? The head makes a nice, fat target to sit in the center of your crosshairs. Trying to stick a bullet through a hole the size of a quarter from a few hundred yards away is a pretty risky move if you really want to kill someone.

But maybe the perpetrators just needed a lot of blood (here’s how they do it in the movies) without a lot of gore from having the back of your head blown off (shades of JFK) which would be difficult to stage manage in front of a live crowd?

Two males can be seen standing near Charlie and making unusual hand gestures just prior to the shooting. Who were these guys? Accomplices of the sniper? Or giving Charlie verbal acting cues to prepare him for the shot?

Another small point. People hit by gunshots usually grimace from the shock and pain. Remember Lee Oswald’s facial expression when he got shot, point blank by Jack Ruby on live TV? Charlie just slumped over.

Am I saying the shooting was faked? No, not at this time. But it’s a possibility. Remember, none of us saw a plane actually fly into the second World Trade Center tower—we saw it on television. Remember also that the U.S. military (DARPA) had AI video generation technology long before releasing it to the public.

Regardless, this event in future hindsight may be the ‘firing on Fort Sumter moment’ that will spark Civil War 2.0. Already, anger-fueled liberals everywhere are rejoicing over his death, causing outraged populists to want to do to them what was done to Charlie.

Meanwhile, unreported in America media, mobs of financially distressed protesters can be seen marching in national capitols all across Europe. Rioting youth in Nepal, outraged over the banning of social media, recently stormed and burned the Parliament building to the ground as the government collapsed and officials fled the country.

All of these events are early stage “cracks in the ice” that will likely lead to global revolutionary contagion and result in totally new forms of government a decade from now.

The last time the United States went through a traumatic transition like this was in 1789 when monarchy was discarded for a constitutional republic. What type of government will come next? No one knows.

But here is what I suspect: those who want to survive the next decade need to learn what those living in 1789 knew about food, water, shelter and real money. Got gold?