Notes From Gordon: Brand, Fitts, Carlson... Clueless? Controlled? Or Just Careful?

I was genuinely surprised to see Russell Brand reference Douglas Vogt (RIP) in this video.

Vogt clearly explains in his Diehold Foundation series on YouTube—and proves to my satisfaction—how every ~12,000 years the Earth’s geomagnetic poles reverse, the sun casts off its matter shell in a violent explosion, much of the oceans are vaporized and flung high into the atmosphere, snow falls for decades and a new Ice Age is launched.

Brand shows a clip of a video in which Vogt explains the CIA’s stated mission to deceive the public. Brand then goes on to relate a hodge podge of miscellaneous facts, like the ~ 26,000 orbital precession, the Great Pyramids partially submerged in the past (true) and more, none of which put the puzzle pieces together.

Could he really be this clueless? Is he promoting sensationalism for monetizable clicks? Or is he under control and just being careful?

Catherine Austin Fitts (CAF) in recent interviews speaks of the $21+ trillion missing from the federal budget (fact); how she tracked it down and concluded that it had been spent on vast infrastructure constructed beneath the continental United States (ditto), presumably as she says, for Continuity of Government (COG).

Not according to Vogt, who demonstrates beyond conjecture that the government is well aware of the coming geomagnetic reversal and has constructed an entire subterranean civilization to survive the next cataclysm.

In her interviews CAF references climate change, the Younger Dryas, etc., none of which explains the facts. Given how well informed she clearly is, and I respect her greatly, how could she be this far off the mark? Because she knows where to draw the line?

I have never been too impressed with Tucker Carlson who, in a recent interview with CAF, demonstrates how little he knows about any of the above. So I’ll leave him right there.

Then there’s the Suspicious Observers YouTube channel (of which I have long been suspicious) which references various theories to explain epochal shifts in Earth’s orbit (all of which Vogt totally destroys), yet totally ignores the ~12,000 year cyclicality.

Houston, we have a problem. These “influencers” and “thought leaders” either: (a) don’t understand the situation, or (b) are playing dumb to protect themselves.

Which is worse? I honestly don’t know. What I do know is that, if you’re going to get to the truth about anything, you’re going to have to do it yourself.